BEFTCentre.org

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Hold Me Tight® for Couples >
      • Experiencing EFT
  • For Couples
    • Hold Me Tight® in Britain
    • Online Hold Me Tight
    • What is EFT?
  • Find a Therapist
    • Therapist Directory Alphabetical by Surname
    • Therapist Directory Alphabetical by Town/City
    • Online/Phone EFT therapy
    • Levels of Training/Certification in EFT
  • For Therapists
    • EFT Training >
      • Britain based EFT Training
      • The road to Certification
      • International EFT Training
      • Online EFT Training
    • Local EFT Peer Groups
    • Joining BEFT Centre >
      • Membership
    • Resources for Therapists >
      • About EFT
      • Annual Conference 2019
      • Articles on EFT
      • Links
  • BEFT Events 2022
    • 2022 Annual Conference >
      • 2022 Conference Timetable
      • Venue and Accommodation
      • 2021 Annual Conference >
        • 2021 Conference Programme
      • 2020 Annual Conference >
        • Pre-Conference 2020
        • Conference 2020
        • Register and Pay
    • 'Special Event' online
  • Members Area
    • JOINING THE BEFT CENTRE DIRECTORY
    • What's New?
    • EFT Supervisors
    • EFT Supervision Groups
    • Special Interest Groups
    • Volunteers wanted
    • Resources For Therapists >
      • Forms for Therapists
      • Forms For Use with Couples
      • Articles on EFT
      • EFT books
    • EFT Therapist Certification >
      • Certification Case Presentation Guidance
      • 2021 Annual Conference
    • 2019 Annual Conference >
      • Presentations and Workshops
    • Resources - 2018 Annual Conference >
      • Welcome
      • Pain in Disguise - Transforming Shame in EFT
      • Working with the Self of the Therapist
      • Through Stuckness to Vulnerability: Clarifying Steps 3 & 5
      • BEFT Community - Connecting, Collaborating, Contributing
      • Plenary
    • BEFT Community National Event 2016
    • The workings of the BEFT Centre >
      • GDPR and the BEFT Community
      • 2018-19 Strategy >
        • 2016-17 Building and Growing
  • Hold Me Tight® in Britain
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Hold Me Tight® for Couples >
      • Experiencing EFT
  • For Couples
    • Hold Me Tight® in Britain
    • Online Hold Me Tight
    • What is EFT?
  • Find a Therapist
    • Therapist Directory Alphabetical by Surname
    • Therapist Directory Alphabetical by Town/City
    • Online/Phone EFT therapy
    • Levels of Training/Certification in EFT
  • For Therapists
    • EFT Training >
      • Britain based EFT Training
      • The road to Certification
      • International EFT Training
      • Online EFT Training
    • Local EFT Peer Groups
    • Joining BEFT Centre >
      • Membership
    • Resources for Therapists >
      • About EFT
      • Annual Conference 2019
      • Articles on EFT
      • Links
  • BEFT Events 2022
    • 2022 Annual Conference >
      • 2022 Conference Timetable
      • Venue and Accommodation
      • 2021 Annual Conference >
        • 2021 Conference Programme
      • 2020 Annual Conference >
        • Pre-Conference 2020
        • Conference 2020
        • Register and Pay
    • 'Special Event' online
  • Members Area
    • JOINING THE BEFT CENTRE DIRECTORY
    • What's New?
    • EFT Supervisors
    • EFT Supervision Groups
    • Special Interest Groups
    • Volunteers wanted
    • Resources For Therapists >
      • Forms for Therapists
      • Forms For Use with Couples
      • Articles on EFT
      • EFT books
    • EFT Therapist Certification >
      • Certification Case Presentation Guidance
      • 2021 Annual Conference
    • 2019 Annual Conference >
      • Presentations and Workshops
    • Resources - 2018 Annual Conference >
      • Welcome
      • Pain in Disguise - Transforming Shame in EFT
      • Working with the Self of the Therapist
      • Through Stuckness to Vulnerability: Clarifying Steps 3 & 5
      • BEFT Community - Connecting, Collaborating, Contributing
      • Plenary
    • BEFT Community National Event 2016
    • The workings of the BEFT Centre >
      • GDPR and the BEFT Community
      • 2018-19 Strategy >
        • 2016-17 Building and Growing
  • Hold Me Tight® in Britain

Recognizing & Following Markers – Part 2:
Responding to Verbal & Non-Verbal Micro-Process Markers in the De-escalation of Stage One - Lorrie Brubacher

15th Issue Fall 2012
the EFT community news 
​
Lorrie Brubacher, M.Ed., LMFT
Certified EFT Supervisor & Trainer
Greensboro Charlotte Center for EFT ​
It sounds reassuring to have a map to follow to achieve de-escalation, but what are the markers of client experiencing that an EFT couple therapist looks for in order to orient herself on this map?

This is the second in a series of toolbox articles highlighting markers to watch for while attuning moment-to-moment to each partner’s experience and to the impact partners are having on one another in each here-and-now moment.  The first article (Summer 2012) featured verbal and non-verbal micro-process markers signaling for the therapist’s attention and response. This article focuses on markers of present moment emotional experience in the de-escalation process. The next toolbox will consider markers of present moment experiences of the cycle.

Markers of present moment emotional experience 
1. The  manner  in  which  an  event  is  described or  recounted  presents  numerous  markers  of present  moment  emotional  experience  that  can be  reflected  and  evoked  in  an  attachment  context without getting distracted by the content: 
Picture
Picture

a)  Marker:    Strong emotional responses interrupt the story.
Task:    Reflect  and  validate  the  strong  emotion, framing  it  in  an  attachment  context: 
​
“You  feel deprived  of  his  attention;  you  are  starving  for  her acceptance.”  ​

b)              Marker:    A partner is incongruently unemotional while recounting a story with a seemingly powerful emotional impact.
Task:    Reflect and be curious about the meaning of the partner’s emotional detachment and the incongruence between the intensity of the words and the lack of apparent affect. Use your curiosity to  unpack  the  emotion  process signaled by this marker: 
“You  say,  ‘All  my  actions  are  driven  by  fear  – fear  she  wants  to  destroy  me,’  as  though  you  were reporting a simple fact - and I can’t help but wonder how very, very terrifying this must be.”

2. Marker:  Emotionally intense beliefs or rigidly held appraisals are stated as facts. 
For example:       
“He feels like he is so perfect and I can’t ever get him to hear me. So I have to stop trying.”

“She never knows how I feel and I know she doesn’t even care.”
​

“Nothing can ever change because I failed to be the husband she wanted  and now nothing I ever do can make it up to her.” 

These are cognitive appraisals or attachment meanings created to make sense of the unbearable or as-yet-unaccessed primary emotion. These bullets or harsh jabs call for an attachment reframe to soften the blow and to make some coherence out of what is happening in the moment.  Remain clear about whose emotion you are reflecting and exploring. These rigidly held assumptions are not truths to be reflected about another person.  For  example,  it  would  not  be  helpful  to  reflect  in the  first  example  above: 
“You  feel  defeated  by  his feeling  so  perfect.”    
There is no indication that he feels perfect but rather that this is the explanation she makes of his habitual responses in the cycle.

Picture
Picture
Task 1:  Reflect/reframe these statements as 
“What you say to yourself?” 
Or, 
“Your best attempt to make sense out of your pain, loneliness or fear is to explain it like this.” 
​Or, 
“When you feel this lonely, (implied primary emotion) you explain it as though he just doesn’t listen or care, (attachment meaning) and it hurts so much you have begun to give up trying to reach him.” (action tendency).

Task 2:  Evoke and unpack the process of emotion that happens before this appraisal is made:
​
•           Understand the cue by asking:  
“What tells you that she doesn’t care how you feel?” 
•           Evoke the bodily felt limbic sense of attachment danger: 
“When she says or does that, or when you see that look on her face or hear that tone of voice, (replaying the cue) what happens inside your body?” 
•           Evoke awareness of the habitual response or action tendency: 
“When that happens, how do you typically respond?”  
​Or, “What do you feel like doing?”

•           Evoke primary emotion:   
“When you do that, what do you feel on the inside?  Is there anything tender that you might feel, even for a split second, before you feel that annoyance?”

3. Marker: Attachment issues are identified only as a problem with the partner and no personal ownership is taken, such as: 
“She is never satisfied with me,” 
or, 
​
“He can never be counted on” (negative working models of other). 
Picture
Task:  Frame  these  problems  as  central  to  the relationship distress: ​
“Seeing your partner as largely the  problem  here,  must  leave  you  feeling  pretty helpless  about  how  to  improve  your  relationship.”  
​Validate: 
"How  difficult  it  must  be  to  feel  that  she is  never  satisfied  with  you.”   
Evoke the emotional and behavioral responses:  
“How is that, for you to believe that you cannot count on your partner?”; 
or, 
​
“How do you respond to your partner when you feel  she  can  never  be  satisfied?”.    
Be transparent about the need to further explore and join together as detectives to discover how they are caught in a cycle or a dance that seems to be hurting both of them and keeping both of them from getting their mutual needs for acceptance and intimacy met.

4.  Marker:  Powerful and conflicting emotions are present at the same time.
There  could  be  intense  anger  mixed  with  twinges of  primary  fear  or  futile  helplessness  tinged  with shame or worthlessness.  Another common example is seen in expressions of hurt – the complex blend of anger, sadness and fear of loss.  

Picture
Task:  Begin by validating the obvious (secondary) anger  in  criticism,  for  example,  and  the  futility  or nervousness  in  withdrawal. Until a client is ready to stay with the leading edge of the emotion long enough to reformulate the reactive emotion as fear of  abandonment or rejection, the therapist needs to stay in the present moment with him or her by accepting and validating the secondary reactivity first. Gradually the client may move slowly into the leading edge of the more vulnerable emotion, with gentle conjectures or evocative questions.
​
With hurt, validate what is most accessible, such as the anger and evoke or conjecture about another part such as sadness or even fear of losing:  
“I get the part of you that flares up in anger when you see her shut down (validate). I wonder if perhaps there is an edge of fear too in your heart as you say, ‘There she goes – she just shut down!  Will she ever let me back in?’.”

5. Markers of attachment significance in a replay of the last fight.
Partners reactively recount their last fight – as though looking for the therapist to choose sides or to solve the problem. 

Picture
Task: To stay out of problem solving and the content trap, EFT therapists engage partners in moment-to-moment experiencing, by noting and responding to markers of attachment significance. Reflect obvious emotion and ask evocative questions to access each element of the emotion process. For example, with an anxious client, validate the obvious surface frustration, the assumptions and explanations made to explain what the other partner did.   Possibly conjecture at the implied loneliness and how that relates to their fury. With an avoidant partner, validate the apparent numbness and the hints of helplessness and inadequacy, and how that relates to their dismissive actions.
​
Also focus on the typical sequences of how they interact and protect selves with attacks and counter attacks such as 
“The more you hide, the more I panic and chase you; the more you criticize, the more I sink and defend myself.”

6. Marker: Repeated stories of pivotal moments or sore points that have obvious significance for one partner seem unimportant or confusing to the other.
Picture
Task: Stay with each partner in turn, validating the emotional significance for one and the confusion for the other.  Expand the significance of the event for the troubled partner, using it as a reference point for each one’s emotional music and track how the dance unfolds:    
“It sounds like how you guys often get caught in this distancing dance - Jane, you continue to rage at Tom for forgetting your mother’s  birthday, and Tom you shrug  and say ‘it’s not  such  a  big  deal,  I  can’t  be  perfect.’ It’s almost as though your attempts, Jane, to get Tom to hear your pain, touch that place in you, Tom, that dreads to hear you have failed Jane, so you brush her off.  And Jane, your pain grows deeper with the sense he doesn’t care.”   ​

The  first  four  markers  described  above  have focused  primarily  on  partners’  inner  emotional experience,  whereas  the  last  two  markers  open the door to exploring the cycle as it is triggered in-session.  When you can use these markers to enter and  expand  your  clients’  world,  partners  begin  to experience  themselves  and  each  other  in  a  new light,  thus  paving  the  way  toward  de-escalation. Following the attachment-based map of delineating and de-escalating negative cycles becomes much easier when we recognize that our clients are giving us markers along the way to guide our responses. 

To download a PDF copy of this article click on the link below:
15_recognizing___following__markers_–_part_2_-_responding_to_verbal_and_non-verbal_micro_process_markers_in_the_de-escalation_of_stage_one_-_lorrie_brubacher.pdf
File Size: 293 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

The British EFT Centre - Creating Connection for EFT Across Britain
Emotionally Focused Therapy - EFT
We welcome feedback and questions about EFT.
​Contact Us with your enquiry.
 ©2018 British EFT Centre Disclaimer
BEFT Centre is an approved affiliate of ICEEFT (International Centre for Excellence in Emotionally Focused Therapy).
ICEEFT logo